Sunday, March 11, 2012

The Life with Youtube


Do you know that “500 years of YouTube video” are watched on Facebook every single day?

Google has released new statistics around YouTube usage across the world and the world’s favorite video website continues to set new records. Here are some highlights:

·         In 2011, YouTube had more than 1 trillion views (video playbacks).
·         Every person on Earth spends an average of 26 minutes on Youtube per month.
·         60 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute. This number was only “48 hours” a couple of months ago.
·         Over 4 billion YouTube videos are viewed a day up from 3 billion so the new channel based layout seem to be doing well for YouTube.
·         Over 3 billion hours of video are watched each month on YouTube.
The one figure that has however stayed constant for YouTube in the past few months is the number of unique visitors. YouTube, according to the press page, gets around 800 million uniques every month so they still another 50 million to beat Facebook.
Facebook gets around a trillion page views every month according to Google’s own data.
The YouTube statistics page also says that 700 YouTube videos are shared on Twitter each minute. Surprisingly, there’s still no mention of Google Plus on that page.


Let See the History of YouTube with facts and figure.





Saturday, March 10, 2012

Having Power Can Make You Stupid

Do you ever get the sense that the more powerful people get, the more foolish they become? You’re not the only one. Four university professors thought the same thing, and they devised a test to find out if it’s really true. It is, they concluded.
That is, they found that power dependably breeds overconfidence, and overconfidence dependably leads to bad decisions. Nathanael Fast, of the Marshall School of Business at the University of Southern California, Niro Sivanathan, of London Business School, Nicole Mayer, of the University of Illinois, and Adam Galinsky, of the Kellogg School at Northwestern University, noticed two well-known instances of calamitous overconfidence among the powerful: Steve Case‘s blithe orchestration of the $350 billion merger of AOL and Time Warner in 2000, and BP‘s massive obliviousness to risks, under Tony Hayward, that led to the Deepwater Horizon disaster.
The four wanted to know, are such overconfident people drawn to power, or does power itself create their overconfidence?
They had subjects write detailed accounts of times when they had had or had lacked power. They then had them answer a series of factual questions and rate how confident they were about their answers. They found that the people who had been primed to think of themselves as more powerful had more confidence in their answers than the rest—and yet their answers were actually less accurate. Yes, “confidence in one’s answers was inversely correlated with accuracy.”
Four follow-up experiments confirmed and expanded the results. The researchers came to a disturbing conclusion:
"Not only do overconfident people tend to acquire roles that afford power . . . but the subjective sense of power brought on by these roles causes people to become further overconfident. . . . Finding practical ways to soften and/or hold in check the causal relationship between power and overconfidence represents an important endeavor for future research. Helping the powerful safely escape this perilous aspect of power is not only in the interest of power holders, but is also in the interest of all who are daily impacted by their decisions."
What can you do? One answer, apparently, is to humiliate the powerful. The fifth and final experiment the four conducted found that the tie between power and overconfidence “was eliminated when the powerful were made to feel incompetent.”
The full study is being prepared for publication in the journal Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

Original Content by:
Frederick E. Allen, Forbes Staff

The Six Surprising Habits of Today's Highly Effective Leaders




If you were to rewrite the seven habits of highly effective leaderstoday what would you say? As social business becomes more important, and social media more pervasive, leaders need to adapt. In fact leaders need to learn fast about what motivates large ecosystems of free agents to rally to them, not to their competitors.
There’s a new level of transparency around a leader’s actions. They are visible and known, they have reputations that depend on the vast community of independent peers whose incomes rely on their judgment and actions.

Their businesses are very likely to be dependent on people they will never meet, such as those in API communities or in supplier and partner ecosystemsThey have large peer networks that they need to persuade and encourage. They are vulnerable to adverse opinion expressed online by strangers or pressure groups.
In the past they had employees to impress and instruct. Even now, for example in fast moving consumer goods, supermarkets act fast and loose with suppliers. I can’t see that happening with a developer ecosystem.
Leaders face an environment that is wholly different from that of ten years ago. In short leaders need to develop new effective habits.
There has been some fascinating discussion here on Forbes about the bad habits of leaders led by Erick Jackson with a notable contribution from Chunka Mui.
I tend to think that the key to the debate lies in this new environment rather than in historical analyses.
Sure, there are still executives who see themselves in the old swashbuckling mode or like to think of management as equivalent to flying at 30,000 feet.
Acceptable or good habits a decade back might not work now.
Truly great modern leaders know they depend on an ecosystem and multiple peer groups; they need the peer groups’ trust; they need their peers to invest in the company vision perhaps by building apps or by developing complementary platforms (for example, think of all those people who have bought into PayPal’s X Commerce initiative).
They know their every move is being watched (at least all the moves they make public).
Those conditions call for new leadership skills and in our recent book The Elastic Enterprise Nick Vitalari and I have spelled out what we believe are the top six.
The six new habits of highly effective leaders are:
1. Invention – All of the leaders we studied are inventors to some degree. They generate ideas or they strongly direct an invention process that is more than just innovation.
Steve Jobs was a great example of that but so too are people likeJohn Donahue at eBay who has set about reinventing the company. And take a look at what’s happening at Mastercard. Today’s leaders invent rather than innovate.

Leaders need to have the scientist’s and technologist’s habit of tinkering with systems and knowing something new can come of it. They have to be driven by novelty.
2. Reframing – The new leader has an ability to “reframe”. That is new leaders habitually create new perspectives on the challenges the enterprise faces.   They have the capacity to reframe the vision, mission or values of the enterprise. Most important they can bring people along with them; they enable everyone in their orbit to reframe.
Take Jobs and Apple – a computer company becoming a phone company and a music vendor. These radical adjacency moves normally cause a company to stall. The obvious reason is because they play against the existing corporate culture.Leaders with the right communications habits can make them seem a natural out growth of company culture. They can reframe the corporate culture substantially to take on new opportunities. But they not only have to convince employees – analysts, partners, developer ecosystems. They need persuading too, effortlessly.
Leaders need a consummate ability to see things differently and to keep people around them open to mind-changing ways of thinking.
3. Attraction and orchestration – A leader in an elastic enterprise has to attract and orchestrate a huge range of assets outside the firm through its business ecosystems. The biggest change in economics in two centuries is taking place around us. Companies scale through their ecosystem rather through investing in owned resources.
Leaders must have the powers of persuasion to attract those resources.
And they need the status to orchestrate activity among peer groups in their resource pool.
They need to cultivate a habit of welcoming the little guy, and indeed all comers, even though they enjoy success themselves.
And the best way to attract free agents seems to be through a movement. Leaders need to lead something more than their own company. It looks effective when it is a movement that stretches across peer groups and moves people to join in.
Leaders need the habit of speaking to a bigger picture, one that draws out human aspirations and changes behaviour.
4. Influence – While the tools of the elastic enterprise enable leaders to orchestrate huge ecosystems, they also need to influence, cajole, encourage and incentivize the members of those ecosystems. Influence is an appropriate medium for leading in an ecosystem full of independent businesses. Influence can expand without limit whereas other forms of power are limited by control systems that people want to escape.
In ecosystems influence is won in highly public spaces like the online world.
But this “influence” is not about a social media strategy. Look at Reed Hasting’s demise last year to get a sense of how quickly even an adept CEO can be roasted in public, if he or she loses the capacity to influence a debate.
Leaders need to master the ecosystem’s information architecture, part own it and definitely influence it comprehensively. That means cultivating a habit of appearing both sage and flexible, being vocal and attentive.
5. Drawing the lines – Leaders typically need to define new barriers are their companies ferret out opportunity in converged markets. They are doing radical things, and they are showing a new degree of openness. Knowing when to draw the line, though, is the difference between success and failure.
They need to draw these line between consultaton and instruction, not just for themselves but also on behalf of an ecosystem that is following them, in the expectation of success.
Sapience lies in knowing where to draw the line between what an open community wants and shouts for and what might work best for the peer community and the cornerstone company. Jobs did it with Flash for mobile.
Leaders need to cultivate a strong sense of boundary setting and not be too susceptible to, for example, the open management fad, while also being accountable to peers. These are subtle differences to grasp.
6. De-risking – The emerging economy requires a new approach to risk, not least because greet companies are now executing radical adjacency moves, at will.
This economy is global, hyper-competitive and replete with opportunity that leaders are seizing with radical adjacency moves – that is by making moves into market where they have no core competency.
The new leader knows how to prepare for those opportunities by creating a very high standard of strategic options portfolio management. The strategic options portfolio is a constant search for new options, new alternatives, and new markets, which plays out through M&A, big data, real time know-how, which in turn means leaders have to be very good at the new knowledge environment.
Leaders need to develop a habit of knowledgeability and they need to inculcate it into their peers, and while being able to give strong direction they also need to multiply the options available to them. They need the habit of learning everyday.
That’s it – six new, necessary and highly effective habits.

Original Content: 
Forbes.com
Haydn Shaughnessy, Contributor
Documenting the emerging economy